Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Marx Hide & Tallow Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided March 31, 1945No. 766PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
This action was filed by Chester Bowles, Price Administrator, on November 4, 1944, against the defendant “Marx Hide & Tallow Company, a corporation, Louisville, Kentucky,” as stated in the caption. The complaint states that the Marx Hide and Tallow Company is a corporation with its principal place of business located in the City of Louisville, Jefferson County, Kentucky. Summons was issued against “Marx Hide and Tallow Company, a corporation. *298Louisville, Kentucky.” The return of service reads as follows:
“I hereby certify and return, that on the 4th day of Nov. 1944 I…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Sperry Products, Inc. v. Association of American RailroadsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- University of Louisville v. HammockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- McGinnis v. Valvoline Oil Works, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Schmidt v. Peoples Telephone Union of Maryville, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cabot v. Clearwater Construction CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Kerner v. RackmillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
- Adams v. Beland Realty CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Godfrey v. Eastern Gas & Fuel AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1947
- Wagner v. New York, Ontario and Western RailwayDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.