Legal Opinion

Leobigildo Uriostegui Albarran v. The State of Wyoming

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2013No. S-13-0030PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶1] The appellant was charged by Information with three crimes after a sexually charged attack on his sister-in-law. On the morning trial was to begin, the district court allowed the State to amend Count III of the Information in order to clarify that the charge was for aggravated burglary, not simply burglary. A jury convicted the appellant of aggravated burglary along with battery and third-degree sexual assault. The appellant contends the district court improperly permitted amendment of the aggravated burglary charge. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶2] Did the district court abuse its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Estrada-Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Spagner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Wilkening v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sean Alan Rogers v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Joseph D. LaJeunesse v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Jason Henry Roberts v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Anthony Frank Torres v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API