Wilkening v. State

BURKE, Justice.

[11] Fredrick C. Wilkening appeals from his conviction for felony interference with a peace officer. Mr. Wilkening contends that the district court erred by denying his motion requesting an independent mental examination and his motion to change his plea to not guilty by reason of mental deficiency or illness. Mr. Wilkening also claims the district court erred by allowing the State to amend the information on the day of trial. We affirm.

ISSUES

[12] Mr. Wilkening phrases the issues on appeal as:

1. Whether the district court abused its discretion when it denied [his] motion for an…