Legal Opinion

State v. Howard -Motion to suppress

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 2013No. 40239PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Judge Pro Tem.

Derk Warner Howard appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of a marijuana grow located in his shed on the curtilage of his home. The plants were discovered by police after they went to his front door, knocked, and while at the front door, smelled fresh growing marijuana. Howard contends that under recent United States Supreme Court precedent, Florida v. Jardines, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 1409, 185 L.Ed.2d 495 (2013), the police officers’ entry onto the curtilage of his home and up to his front door (the location where an officer smelled…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. James Robert Christensen, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. George Alan KapelleIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. AlbertsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. Dennis Earl HiebertIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. United States v. HolmesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API