State v. Dennis Earl Hiebert
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MELANSON, Judge.
Dennis Earl Hiebert appeals from his judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Specifically, he alleges that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the grounds supporting the warrant to search his property were gained from an unconstitutional warrantless search. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Hiebert is the owner of a junk and salvage yard known as “Mr. D’s.” Hiebert also resides on the property. After receiving a tip that two fugitive felons might be on Hiebert’s property, three officers…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- New York v. ClassSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. CarlossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- State of Tennessee v. James Robert Christensen, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- United States v. HolmesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- State v. ChuteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- DEQ v. GibsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.