Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Moffatt

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1928No. 6,332PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Action for the recovery of specific personal property. Eugene Elizabeth Drake commenced the action by the filing of a complaint containing the usual and necessary averments, in an action in claim and delivery, as to her ownership and right to possession of the property particularly described, at the commencement of the action, the value thereof, the wrongful taking and retention by defendant, demand therefor and defendant’s refusal to yield possession, and the damages suffered. It further alleged that defendant claimed to own the property. By appropriate proceedings plaintiff thereafter…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Claudius v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Pico v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Erreca v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Pitts Agricultural Works v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Banning v. MarleauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Victor Robert Nava, Sr., AKA Big Vic, and Victoria NavaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. C. I. T. Corp. v. Biltmore GarageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. State Ex Rel. Olsen v. SundlingMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Fergus Motor Co. v. SchottMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. United States v. NavaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API