Legal Opinion

United States v. Nava

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 18, 2005No. 03-30010Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 03-30010 VICTOR ROBERT NAVA, SR., aka Big Vic,  D.C. No. CR-00-00121-JDS Defendant, OPINION and VICTORIA NAVA, Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Jack D. Shanstrom, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted March 5, 2004—Seattle, Washington Filed April 18, 2005 Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Bybee; Dissent by Judge Rymer 4217 4220…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API