Westerheide v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
767 So.2d 637 (2000)
Mitchel WESTERHEIDE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D99-785.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
September 29, 2000.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, for Appellee.
SAWAYA, J.
I. Introduction.
The State of Florida, the appellee, instituted commitment proceedings against Mitchel Westerheide, the appellant, pursuant to the "Jimmy Ryce Act,"[1] hereinafter referred to as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited78 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Westerheide v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- People v. Superior Court (Ghilotti)California Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. GoodeSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Beasley v. Molett, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. DenglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.