Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Oregon Electric Ry. Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1914PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From Multnomah: William N. Gatens, Judge. Department 1. Statement by Mr. Justice Moore. This is an action by L. B. McFarland against the Oregon Electric Railway Company, a corporation, to recover $50,000 as damages, resulting from the death of his son, Neal J. McFarland, alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence in failing properly to guard electric wires at a substation, in consequence of which the deceased, an employee of the defendant, received a shock…

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: William N. Gatens, Judge. Department 1. Statement by Mr. Justice Moore. This is an action by L. B. McFarland against the Oregon Electric Railway Company, a corporation, to recover $50,000 as damages, resulting from the death of his son, Neal J. McFarland, alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence in failing properly to guard electric wires at a substation, in consequence of which the deceased, an employee of the defendant, received a shock October 7, 1912, causing instantaneous death at the age of 19 years, 7 months, and 25 days. From a judgment in plaintiff’s…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

1. As a preliminary matter it is maintained by plaintiff’s counsel that a review of the errors attempted to be assigned should not be undertaken. The formal statement in typewriting of the exceptions taken by *30defendant’s counsel during the trial of the cause to the rulings and instructions of the court, comprising 23 pages, is certified to by the judge in the usual manner, and it is further attested that Exhibit “A” contains all the testimony and evidence offered, together with the instructions given and refused, and that the bill of exceptions was settled and allowed August 27, 1913. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Munro v. Pacific Coast Dredging & Reclamation Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Beeson v. Green Mountain Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Bourg v. Brownell-Drews Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Camenzind v. Freeland Furniture Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Cathcart v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. McClaugherty v. Rogue River Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Piukkula v. Pillsbury Astoria Flouring Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Yovovich v. Falls City Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API