Legal Opinion

Minelian v. Manzella

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1989No. B043724PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

Plaintiff landlord appeals from an adverse judgment in an unlawful detainer lawsuit. In Nourafchan v. Miner (1985) 169 Cal.App.3d 746 [215 Cal.Rptr. 450], a decision by this division, we stated that a tenant had “the right to offset the excess rent paid during the three-year statutory period (Code Civ. Proc., § 338) within which he could bring an action based on [Santa Monica City Charter] section 1809, subdivision (a).” (Id., at pp. 752-753.)

We ordered this case transferred from the appellate department of the superior court to this court and requested briefing on “the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Doe v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Gombiner v. SwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Lynch & Freytag v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Palm Property Investments, LLC v. YadegarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API