Legal Opinion

Gombiner v. Swartz

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 2008No. B196182PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, J.

Tenant Andrew S. Combiner appeals from the court’s judgment following a trial involving his residential lease of a home owned by landlord Daniel B. Swartz. Because the trial court erroneously found Los Angeles’s Rent Stabilization Ordinance (L.A. Mun. Code, § 151.00 et seq.) did not apply to the dispute, we reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In 1997, landlord Daniel B. Swartz (landlord) converted the house he owned at 1314 Sunset Plaza Drive in Los Angeles into two residential units designated as 1400 and 1314 Sunset Plaza Drive. In January 1998, tenant Andrew S. Combiner…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. GuitonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. People v. SalcidoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. WhisenhuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Carter v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Ayala v. Dawson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. A.R.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Ayala v. DawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API