Legal Opinion
Feldman v. Bomar
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 3, 2008No. 06-55675PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed January 10, 2008 is amended as follows: Slip op., page 371, line 6, : After the sentence reading, “On July 5, 2005, two years after the SCIPRP was approved, IDA, Feldman, and Puddi-combe (individuals who frequent the island and enjoy viewing the pigs) filed suit principally seeking to enjoin the feral pig eradication,” add footnote No. 3 as follows: “ 3 Because Appellants concede the pigs could not remain on the island and contest only the manner in which they should have been removed, it is at least open to question whether…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. William G. Gordon, and State of Oregon, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Cantrell v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Doe v. Madison School District No. 321Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Neighbors of Cuddy Mountain v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Zixiang Li v. John F. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Siskiyou Regional Education Project v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- protectmarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. Debra BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.