Legal Opinion

Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Bureau of Land Management

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 22, 2012No. 10-72356, 10-72552, 10-72762, 10-72768, 10-72775PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Our case concerns a decision by the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) to authorize the Ruby Pipeline Project (“Project”). The Project involves the construction, operation, and maintenance of a 42-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline extending from Wyoming to Oregon, over 678 miles. The right-of-way for the pipeline encompasses approximately 2,291 acres of federal lands and crosses 209 rivers and streams that support federally endangered and threatened fish species. According to a Biological Opinion (“the Biological Opinion” or “the Opinion”) formulated by the Fish…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. Conservation Congress v. Nancy FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Conservation Congress v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Defenders of Wildlife v. Ryan ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Bark v. UsfsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API