Legal Opinion
protectmarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. Debra Bowen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 20, 2014No. 11-17884PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, Jr.; Dissent by Judge WALLACE.
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Appellants bring facial and as-applied challenges to California’s Political Reform Act of 1974, Cal. Gov.Code. §§ 81000-91014(PRA), and seek (1) an injunction exempting them from the PRA’s future reporting deadlines, and (2) declaratory and injunctive relief requiring the State to purge all records of Appellants’ past PRA disclosures. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the State of California on all counts. We affirm the district court’s judgment with regard to Appellants’ facial…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Eugene Hamamoto v. David IgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Miranda Wallingford v. Robert BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans v. Kristin K. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- David Donovan v. Brian VanceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.