Legal Opinion

Fetterman v. Levitch

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1941No. 28110PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff brought suit to recover for personal injuries and property damage resulting from a collision between two automobiles. The action was tried before the court and a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, defendant challenged the sufficiency thereof and moved for a nonsuit, and, at the conclusion of all the evidence, he again interposed a challenge thereto, and at that time moved for a directed verdict. Both motions were denied. The cause was submitted to the jury, and a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff. A motion by defendant for judgment notwithstanding the verdict…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Olsen v. Peerless LaundryWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Pierce v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Delsman v. BertottiWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Lindberg v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Shultes v. HalpinWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Moen v. ChestnutWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Herndon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API