Peterson v. Eishen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Justice.
This appeal arises from a 1982 default paternity adjudication declaring respondent, Larry Lee Eishen, the father of appellant Mary Ellen Peterson’s daughter. In 1991 Eishen moved to vacate the default judgment of paternity and subsequent orders for child support based on lack of jurisdiction due to inadequate service of process. A family court referee denied his motion, but the district court reversed and vacated the judgment and orders as void for lack of personal jurisdiction due to inadequate service of process. The court of appeals agreed, affirming the trial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Boch Oldsmobile, Inc., Boch Toyota, Inc., and Ernest J. BochCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- In Re Center Wholesale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Clarence Austin v. Otis SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Misco Leasing, Inc. v. James H. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- 301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Marriage of Mesenbourg v. MesenbourgCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.