Marriage of Peterson v. Eishen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Mary Peterson appeals from the order granting Larry Eishen’s motion to vacate the judgment of paternity and all subsequent child support orders arguing the trial court erred in determining it lacked personal jurisdiction over Eishen. We affirm.
FACTS
On behalf of appellant, Mary Peterson, Ramsey County initiated a parentage action against respondent, Larry Eishen, on July 20, 1982 by leaving a summons and a complaint at an address in North St. Paul, Minnesota. Although the county attorney’s office had sent a certified letter to Eishen at the North St. Paul address in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Berryhill v. SeppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Lange v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Marriage of Maranda v. MarandaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Hengel v. HyattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Peterson v. EishenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Ponder v. CartmellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.