Meyer v. Buckley
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the ■ City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. Frank H. Smith, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an action by plaintiffs against the defendant to recover for certain services as architects "alleged to have been rendered by plaintiffs at the instance and request of defendant.
The first count is founded upon an express contract to recover five per cent of the total cost of certain improvements, alterations, and additions to the Baltimore Hotel, situated in San Francisco, as compensation for their services as architects in superintending said work. , It is alleged therein that said improvements, alterations, and additions cost the sum of $11,713.08, and that five per cent thereof is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Courteney v. Standard Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- McLean v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Easterbrook v. FarquharsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fawcett v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Howard v. D. W. Hobson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. King Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Collier v. GannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Charlton v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.