Moore v. . State
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The award of the Industrial Commission is conclusive and binding as to all questions of fact. Workmen’s Compensation Law (P. L. 1929, ch. 120), sec. 60. Whether an injury by accident has arisen out of and in the course of a person’s employment is a mixed question of law and fact, and while the parties to an action or proceeding may admit or agree upon facts they cannot make admissions of law which will be binding upon the courts. Rawlings v. Neal, 122 N. C., 173; Binford v. Alston, 15 N. C., 351. If, therefore, the facts as found do not show that the plaintiff was an employee of the State as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Village of West Salem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Rawlings v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Binford v. . AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
- State ex rel. Brown v. ApplebyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- McCumber v. Waukesha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by16 opinions
- Quick v. United Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Hicks v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Aycock v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. PrevetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. PhiferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.