Rawlings v. . Neal
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action of claim and delivery, tried before Timberlake, J., and a jury at Fall Term, 1897, of Nash Superior Court. The facts appear in the opinion. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, (under the instruc-lions of his Honor) for the crops sought to be recovered, and from the judgment thereon defendant' appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Etjrches, J.:
When this case was called the plaintiff moved to dismiss the defendant’s appeal for the reason that the record was not printed as required by Rule 29, and upon inspection it plainly appears that it is not. The printing and punctuation are both bad, and it is printed in a little pamphlet about two thirds the length required by the Rule. As this case 'was tried before the Rule was amended, we hold that it is not subject to the amended Rule, and, while we hold that this case is not subject to the amended Rule, we take occasion to say that we will expect the rule to be complied with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bazemore v. . MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Wells v. . BattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- Binewicz v. HaglinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Moore v. . StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- U Drive It Auto Co. v. Atlantic Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Rogers v. Town of Black MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Pocomoke Guano Co. v. ColwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.