State v. Phifer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
The State contends the warrantless search of the glove compartment of defendant’s car was part of a valid police inventory of the car’s contents. The State relies on South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 49 L.Ed. 2d 1000, 96 S.Ct. 3092 (1976), where the United States Supreme Court held that a police inventory search, when conducted pursuant to standard police procedures, was not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. In upholding the validity of such searches, the Court carefully delineated the context within which an inventory search constitutes a constitutionally…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.