Albert Lloyd Andersen v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEMMON, Circuit Judge.
“It is an old joke,” the appellant’s expert testified, and only semi-humorously, “that you have got to be a little nuts to be a psychiatrist.
“You got to be a little off to be a psychiatrist or you can’t make a living any other way unless you are, and pretty near the same thing follows for a psychologist.”
The appellant himself, however, who holds a Ph.D. in clinical psychology, disagreed with his expert witness.
“It isn’t too good for a psychologist to be crazy,” he said.
That remark might easily be classified as the understatement of the year.
On one occasion, in a movie,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Graham v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Don Wade v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Richard Erwin Sauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.