Legal Opinion

Albert Lloyd Andersen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 21, 1956No. 18-56525PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEMMON, Circuit Judge.

“It is an old joke,” the appellant’s expert testified, and only semi-humorously, “that you have got to be a little nuts to be a psychiatrist.

“You got to be a little off to be a psychiatrist or you can’t make a living any other way unless you are, and pretty near the same thing follows for a psychologist.”

The appellant himself, however, who holds a Ph.D. in clinical psychology, disagreed with his expert witness.

“It isn’t too good for a psychologist to be crazy,” he said.

That remark might easily be classified as the understatement of the year.

On one occasion, in a movie,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. State v. LucasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Graham v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Don Wade v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Richard Erwin Sauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API