Legal Opinion

Don Wade v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1970No. 22657_1PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELY, Circuit Judge:

Once again we sit en banc to consider an appeal challenging the viability of the M’Naghten rules. As recently as 1968 we sat en banc in the consolidated cases of Ramer v. United States and Church v. United States, 390 F.2d 564 (9th Cir. 1968), and decided that neither of the cases contained such an appropriate record as would allow us to reach the merits of the issue of whether more modern standards for the determination of criminal responsibility should be adopted. No other Circuit except the First continues to rely on the ancient M’Naghten rules, and that Circuit has not,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. United States v. Archie W. BrawnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Graham v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bethea v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API