Legal Opinion

Graham v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1977PublishedCited by 163 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*534OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this criminal action to consider four significant questions, viz:

a. The right of an indigent criminal defendant, pleading not guilty by reason of insanity, to a psychiatric examination at state expense.

b. The admissibility of hospital records under the Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act (Sections 24-712— 24-715, T.C.A.) in a criminal action.

c. The correct test for determining the question of criminal responsibility.

d. The correct jury instruction with respect to the burden of proof in criminal prosecutions wherein insanity is pleaded as a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. United States v. Archie W. BrawnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. United States Ex Rel. Smith v. BaldiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. Charles FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by163 opinions

  1. Cone v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Johnson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. HolderCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API