Legal Opinion

Durham v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 10, 1954No. 11859PublishedCited by 483 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Circuit Judge.

Monte Durham was convicted of housebreaking, 1 2 by the District Court sitting without a jury. The only defense asserted at the trial was that Durham was of unsound mind at the time of the offense. We are now urged to reverse the conviction (1) because the trial court did not correctly apply existing rules governing the burden of proof on the defense of insanity, and (2) because existing tests of criminal responsibility are obsolete and should be superseded. 8

I

Durham has a long history of imprisonment and hospitalization. In 1945, at the age of 17, he was discharged…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by483 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. Archie W. BrawnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

478 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API