Legal Opinion

Czarlinsky v. Employment Security Agency

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1964No. 9372PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant, Leta E. Czarlinsky, is hereinafter referred to as claimant. Defendant-Respondent, Idaho Employment Security Agency, is hereinafter referred to as the Agency, and the Industrial Accident Board as the Board.

For approximately four years prior to December 28, 1962, claimant, a widow with no children, was selling cosmetics and general drug store merchandise for a drug store. She was paid $1.50 per hour plus commissions for this employment. During the latter part of her employment, her daytime hours of work were from 9:00 a. m. to 1:30 p. m. On two evenings per…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johns v. SH Kress & CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Weiland Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Corrado v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. In Re Walker's ClaimIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Lowell v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alder v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Oliver v. Creamer Heating & ApplianceIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Totorica v. Western Equipment Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Laundry v. Franciscan Health Care CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bell Fibre Products Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API