Legal Opinion

D'Amato Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 1961No. Appeal, No. 183PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

This is an appeal from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review disqualifying the claimant, Antonio D’Amato, from eligibility for benefits under the provisions of section 402(a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P.S. 802(a).

Claimant was last employed as a cabinetmaker by the Interstate Parlor Frame Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, at $2.00 per hour. His last day of work was April 8, 1960 at which time he had a valid separation therefrom.

On August 26, 1960 claimant received a referral to the Philadelphia Parlor Frame Company. The job…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bentz Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Suska Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Weiland Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Suska Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Horning Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. HomsherCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Carl Colteryahn Dairy, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Estate of Fells ex rel. Boulding v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Lorenzi Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Valentine Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API