Legal Opinion

M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc. v. British-American Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 6, 1925No. 281PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, a New York corporation, has a capital of $3,-000,000, divided into three classes of stock, and is engaged in the textile business and the financing of merchants in that line of business. A. L. & L. L. Lowenstein, who are stockholders and officers of the appellant, are engaged in the factoring business as copartners. Appellee is a Delaware corporation, and had a mill for rubberizing goods at Springdale, Conn. Receivers, who later resigned, were appointed for it in an equity proceeding, and on January 23, 1923, the present receiver, Harrietto C. Brinkerhoff, was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ware v. HyltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
  2. In Re LoneySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Houghton v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Cockle v. FlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Shotwell v. . DixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Joseph J. Hess, Jr. v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Unity Plan Finance Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  3. Kass v. Garfinckel, Brooks Bros., Miller & Rhoads, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Small v. EllisArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In re Lico Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API