Cockle v. Flack
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller
Plaintiffs in error, were engaged in the business of packing pork in Peoria, 111., and the defendants were commission-merchants at Baltimore, in the fall of 1872, when the contract was made which, is the foundation of this suit. There had been transactions between the parties the previous year in the ling of their business, and, with reference to. the packing business of the approaching season, this agreement was made by letter. The substance of it is, that defendants should advance to plaintiffs, as it was needed, the sum of $100,000, which they were to invest in the hog product, at the rate…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Andrews v. PondSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
3Cited by47 opinions
- Seeman v. Philadelphia Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bedford v. Eastern Building and Loan Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Bridges v. SheldonUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
- Warinner v. NugentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.