Legal Opinion

Small v. Ellis

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1961No. 6634PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Judge.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Superior Court of Maricopa County in an action upon a promissory note to which the defense of usury was sustained. The material facts of the case are not in dispute. The plaintiff loaned defendants $210,000 in consideration of which defendants executed a promissory note for $246,750. The promissory note containing an acceleration clause reads as follows:

“Promissory Note
“$246,750.00 Phoenix, Arizona,

May 28, 1952

“As Hereinafter Stated, for value received, we promise to pay to W. J. Small, or order, the sum of Two Hundred…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Reed v. Real Detective Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Parks, Administrator v. LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Sharp v. Mortgage Security Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Altherr v. Wilshire Mortgage CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cannon v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. Browne v. NowlinArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Herbert B. Peterson v. The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Alcombrack v. CiccarelliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API