Legal Opinion

Ware v. Hylton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 7, 1796PublishedCited by 262 opinions

ERROR from the Circuit Court for the Diftrifi of Virginia. The aflion was brought by William fanes, (but as he died, pendente lite, his Adminiftrator was duly fubftitut-ed as Plaintiff in the caufe) furviving partner of Parrel and fanes, fubjedls. of the king of Great Britain, againft Daniel Hylton & Co. and Francis Eppes, citizens of Virginia, on a bond, for the penal fum of ¡£.2976 11J fad. fterling, dated the 7th July, 1774. The Defendants pleaded, ift, Payment; and,…

Read the full summary

ERROR from the Circuit Court for the Diftrifi of Virginia. The aflion was brought by William fanes, (but as he died, pendente lite, his Adminiftrator was duly fubftitut-ed as Plaintiff in the caufe) furviving partner of Parrel and fanes, fubjedls. of the king of Great Britain, againft Daniel Hylton & Co. and Francis Eppes, citizens of Virginia, on a bond, for the penal fum of ¡£.2976 11J fad. fterling, dated the 7th July, 1774. The Defendants pleaded, ift, Payment; and, alfo, by leaveof the court, the following additional pleas in bar of the atftion. 2d. That the Plaintiff ought not to have…

1Opinion of the Court

The Cou-rt,

after great confideration, delivered their opinions, feriatim, as follow :

Chace, Jujtice.

The Defendants in error, on th ' day of July, 1774, palled their penal bond to Farrell and Jones, for the payment of f. 2,976 II 6, of good Britijh money; but the condition of the bond, or the time of payment, does not appear on the record.

On the 20th of-October, 1777, the legislature of the commonwealth of Virginia, palled a law to fequefier Britijh property, In the 3d fedliou of the law, it was enabled, “that it ihould be lawful for any citizen of Virginia, owing money to a fub-je£l of Great…

2Cited by262 opinions

  1. Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Dolly M. E. Filartiga and Joel Filartiga v. Americo Norberto Pena-IralaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

257 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API