Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Burden

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 7, 1913No. 591PublishedCited by 63 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of Appeals to review facts in certain cases coining from the.Bankruptcy Court arid the construction of usury laws of New York, are stated in the opinion. The Circuit Court of Appeals having found that the court below had not committed any errors of law, should have affirmed the final order of the District Court.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of Appeals to review facts in certain cases coining from the.Bankruptcy Court arid the construction of usury laws of New York, are stated in the opinion. The Circuit Court of Appeals having found that the court below had not committed any errors of law, should have affirmed the final order of the District Court. Section 566, Rev. Stat.; Campbell v. United States, 224 U. S. 99; Rogers v. United States, 141 U. S. 548; Campbell v. Boyreau, 21 How. 223. Manifestly, if…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lurton

This is an appeal from a decree determining a controversy arising in a bankruptcy proceeding. The origin of the matter was this: Canfield, the bankrupt, was a merchant in New York. He borrowed from Burden the sum of $10,000, and as security assigned to him certain book accounts, aggregating the sum of $14,000, and agreed to act as agent for Burden in their collection. Shortly afterwards he was adjudicated a bankrupt. The receiver obtained possession of the bankrupt’s books and held on to the assigned accounts and proceeded to collect them upon the claim that the contract was usurious and void…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coder v. ArtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Hewit v. Berlin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Knapp v. Milwaukee Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Stillman v. . NorthrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Scott v. LloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1835

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Taylor v. VossSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Lazarus, Michel & Lazarus v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Central Republic Bank & Trust Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. Brown v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API