Legal Opinion

Dadmun v. City of San Diego

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1908No. Civ. No. 557PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, sustaining a demurrer to a petition for a writ of mandate. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment rendered by the superior court of San Diego county upon an order sustaining a demurrer to a petition for a writ of mandate.

The petitioner applied to the superior court for a writ of mandate requiring the auditing committee of the city of San Diego to allow and order paid a certain claim of plaintiff. In his petition plaintiff sets forth an ordinance duly passed by the city council of the city of San Diego creating the office of special prosecutor, fixing the salary and reposing the appointment thereof in the common council and the appointment of petitioner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Sullivan v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Fleming v. HanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Valle v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott v. Common CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Bond v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API