Legal Opinion

Bond v. City of Pasadena

California Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1936No. L. A. 15472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant city. The plaintiffs sued on a warrant issued by the city on an assessment and diagram after the completion of the work of Ducey and Breitenstein, contractors and assignors of the plaintiffs herein. The warrant was issued in the sum of $13,213.01, and represented the amount payable from the general or other appropriate fund of the city for intersections in connection with a proceeding for the improvement of Lake and other streets, conducted under the provisions of the Street Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730), and the city…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anaheim Sugar Co. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Kaye v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Johnson v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Dadmun v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garrison v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bond v. Farmers & Merchants National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Mortimer v. Acquisition & Improvement District No. 36California Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Garrison v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API