Legal Opinion
Scott v. Common Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 16, 1996No. E015306PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
The trial court signed a judgment and issued a peremptory writ of mandate commanding the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino (Common Council) to reinstate and fund two city attorney investigator positions which were deleted by its budget resolution No. 94-163. The Common Council appeals.
Facts and Procedural History
Resolution No. 94-163 is a resolution adopting the city’s budget for the fiscal year 1994-1995. The petition for writ of mandate, filed July 6, 1994, alleges that the Common Council violated the San Bernardino City Charter (City Charter),…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Stratton v. First National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Hicks v. Bd. of Supervisors of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Nickerson v. San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Carmel Valley Fire Protection District v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Retirement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Kreeft v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- City and County of San Francisco v. BallardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Steiner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.