Legal Opinion
Ager v. Office of Director of Regulation
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
Decided October 30, 1997No. GDTC-AA-97-107PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGuernsey, J.
On May 2, 1997 the Plaintiff Larry Ager, proceeding pro se, appealed to the i Gaming Disputes Court from a “preliminary, procedural or intermediate action” of i the Office of the Director of Regulation, claiming that the same was “clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative and substantial evidence on the whole record”. The Plaintiff had been employed by the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority as a probationary employee pending his application for a non-gaming license, the denial which by the Director of Regulation resulted in termination of his employment. The Defendant has moved to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gilbert McClendon Bernadine F. McClendon Norman McDanel Connie R. McDanel v. United States of America Colorado River Indian Tribal CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Community Collaborative of Bridgeport, Inc. v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Creasey v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
- Worthen v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2000
- MacLean v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals · 2004
- Worthen v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2001
- La Plante v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.