Creasey v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuernsey, Chief Judge
The Plaintiff has brought a civil action pursuant to MTO 95-4, rather than an license appeal pursuant to MTO 2002-13, apparently challenging the failure of the part of the individual Defendant Michael Brown to process the Plaintiffs request for a gaming license1 and the failure of the Defendant Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority to hire her,2 The Defendants have moved to dismiss on grounds that the Defendants are cloaked with the sovereign immunity of The Mohegan Tribe.3
In support of their motion, the Defendants have filed with the Court affidavits, as permitted by G.D.C.P. § 20(b), establishing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Duguay v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Gilbert McClendon Bernadine F. McClendon Norman McDanel Connie R. McDanel v. United States of America Colorado River Indian Tribal CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Kizis v. Morse Diesel International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Romanella v. HaywardDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- La Plante v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2006
- D'Ambra v. MaikshiloMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2012
- Fox v. BrownMohegan Trial Court · 2005
- LaVigne v. Mohegan Tribe of Indians of ConnecticutMohegan Trial Court · 2005
- Lovoi v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.