Legal Opinion

Carbon v. Physical Therapists Examining Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1968No. 4180PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FICKLING, Associate Judge:

This is a review of the denial by respondent of petitioner’s application for registration as a physical therapist without the requirement of an examination.

After a hearing, respondent concluded that petitioner had not submitted satisfactory proof that he had practiced physical therapy during the critical period under the statute, 1 that he had graduated from an approved school, or that he had received comparable training or experience. 2

Petitioner contends that this conclusion was not supported by the evidence.

In 1963, without a hearing, respondent denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Schramm v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Hlebanja v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Olsen v. District of Columbia Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maryland Commissioner of Labor & Industry v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API