Carbon v. Physical Therapists Examining Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FICKLING, Associate Judge:
This is a review of the denial by respondent of petitioner’s application for registration as a physical therapist without the requirement of an examination.
After a hearing, respondent concluded that petitioner had not submitted satisfactory proof that he had practiced physical therapy during the critical period under the statute, 1 that he had graduated from an approved school, or that he had received comparable training or experience. 2
Petitioner contends that this conclusion was not supported by the evidence.
In 1963, without a hearing, respondent denied…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hicks v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Schramm v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Hlebanja v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Olsen v. District of Columbia Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Maryland Commissioner of Labor & Industry v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995