Legal Opinion
B & E Convalescent Center v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 1992No. B056936PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
B & E Convalescent Center (B & E) appeals from the summary judgment entered against it and in favor of defendant and respondent State Compensation Insurance Fund (State Fund) on B & E’s action for declaratory relief, breach of contract, and insurance bad faith. The sole issue on appeal is whether, as a matter of law, State Fund was obligated to defend B & E for the claims asserted in an action brought by Dorothy Bryson (Bryson), 1 a former employee of B & E, in which she alleged wrongful termination and related causes of action, including a violation of the Fair Employment…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Institute for Shipboard Education v. Cigna Worldwide Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Century Transit Systems, Inc. v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Michaelian v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.