Legal Opinion
Shafer v. Ferguson
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 1885No. 11,762PublishedCited by 12 opinions
From the Carroll Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The only question argued by the appellant is that arising upon the ruling of the trial court in admitting the testimony of Alexander Conklin.
It is settled that the record must set forth the objections to the testimony that,were stated to the trial court, and that no objection's can be urged here except those stated to the court upon the trial. It is also settled that objections must be specifically stated, or they will be of no avail. Bottenberg v. Nixon, 97 Ind. 106; Jones v. Angell, 95. Ind. 376; Lake Erie, etc., R. W. Co. v. Parker, 94 Ind. 91; Harvey v. Huston, 94 Ind. 527; McClellan v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McClellan v. BondIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Judah v. American Live Stock InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
- Bottenberg v. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Harvey v. HustonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by12 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Lankford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Burlington Ins. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.