Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Huston

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1884No. 10,881PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Superior Court of Vigo County.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

Appellant, as .assignee of one J. S. Jordon, sued appellee on a promissory note. The defendant answered failure of consideration. There was a trial by jury, verdict for the defendant, and, over a motion for a new trial, judg*528ment was rendered for the defendant for costs. The error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial. And the reasons stated in the motion for a new trial, that are insisted upon, are the admissions of improper evidence. The record shows that the trial was had December 16th, 1882. The motion for a new trial was overruled, and judgment rendered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sutherland v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Cobble v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Miller v. ShrinerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Worthington v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. HazelettIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Richburger v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Enid & Anadarko Railway Co. v. WileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  5. Isler v. BlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API