Legal Opinion
Barlow v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 14, 1950No. Civ. No. 17433PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
This is an action to recover damages for the wrongful death of decedent, Arthur M. Barlow. Defendants Flood Control District and Debus filed separate demurrers to the first amended complaint which were sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff presented a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint.* The motion was denied and *981judgment was thereafter entered in favor of defendants, from which plaintiff has appealed.
The amended complaint alleges that decedent died as the result of having fallen into the flood control channel hereinafter described; that defendants Debus are the owners…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- House v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hunt v. AuthierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Crogan v. SchieleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mills v. Orcas Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- Granone v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Hayashi v. Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Concho Const. Co., Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Mercier v. Naugatuck Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.