Legal Opinion

Pelayo v. JJ Lee Management Co., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 2009No. B208024PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WILLHITE, J.

INTRODUCTION

In this case, we deal with the “do’s and don’ts” of Does. Code of Civil Procedure section 474 authorizes a plaintiff, who is ignorant of the true name of certain defendants, to name them as fictitious, or “Doe,” defendants. Upon discovering a Doe defendant’s true identity, the plaintiff must amend the complaint to allege the defendant’s true name, “provided, that no default or default judgment shall be entered against a defendant so designated” unless two requirements are met. First, the summons must bear “on the face thereof a notice stating in substance” that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bowden v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Mahdavi v. Fair Employment Practice Com.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Clopton v. CloptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Mike Davidov Company v. IssodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Collins v. Navistar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. In re Harrell CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Mattei v. Corporate Management SolutionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Orange Co. Water Dist. v. AlcoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API