Legal Opinion

Collins v. Navistar, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 2013No. C060468PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOCH, J.

In this strict products liability case, we consider whether the criminal nature of a juvenile’s act of throwing rocks and concrete from a freeway overpass relieves a truck manufacturer of the duty to design windshields capable of withstanding common road hazards, such as objects hitting windshields. For the reasons that follow, we conclude the criminal nature of the rock throwing does not cut off liability or negate the duty of the manufacturer to design the truck’s windshield to account for reasonably foreseeable risks. We also explain that the definition of negligence for…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ramos v. Superior Court of San Francisco Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Alborzian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Harb v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Mooring, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Ash v. North American Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API