Legal Opinion

Knoblaugh v. McKinney

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1935No. Civ. 9563PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs, lessors of an apartment house, recovered judgment against defendants, lessees, in this suit for unlawful detainer, for possession of the premises in question and for rent. From such judgment defendants appeal.

In July, 1932, plaintiffs leased to defendants a three-story brick apartment building in the city of Long Beach, at a monthly rental of $320, due on the first day and in default on the tenth day of each month, payable at a designated bank in that city. On March 10, 1933, defendants tendered the rent to said bank but it was refused, owing to a bank holiday…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. WeisbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Pedro v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. C. M. Staub Shoe Co. v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Meek v. CunhaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Norment v. MandellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API