Meek v. Cunha
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment on demurrer sustained to plaintiff’s complaint.
As appears by the complaint, plaintiff, on the thirtieth day of November, 1903, leased of defendants, for the period of ten months next ensuing, fifty-five acres of land then planted in asparagus, which produced annual crops, and which asparagus, it is alleged, constituted, and was then known to defendants to constitute, the material and sole inducement to plaintiff to hire said land. By the terms of the lease plaintiff unconditionally promised to pay as rental the sum of $2,500, to wit, $2,250 at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Viterbo v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Wattles v. South Omaha Ice & Coal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Cowell v. LumleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Niedelet v. WalesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pedro v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Smith v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Knoblaugh v. McKinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Smith v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938