Ziegler v. Wonn
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
Defendants contend on this appeal that there is no credible evidence to sustain the jury’s findings, viz., that the explosion caused the damage to the well and that plaintiffs’ damages were $1,200. In passing on these two contentions it is elementary that the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to sustain the verdict. Smith v. Benjamin (1952), 261 Wis. 548, 550, 53 N. W. (2d) 619. Furthermore, it is only necessary to consider such evidence as will sustain the verdict. Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile Ins. Co. (1954), 266 Wis. 106, 109, 62 N. W. (2d) 549, 63 N. W. (2d) 740.
Caus…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Hallum v. Village of OmroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Michalski v. WagnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Brown v. L. S. Lunder Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Engel v. Dunn CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nashban Barrel & Container Co. v. G. G. Parsons Trucking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Bergmann v. Insurance Company of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Dyer v. Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Osborne-McMillan Elevator Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Lopez v. Prestige Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.