Launstein v. Launstein
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Shiawassee; Smith, J. Bill by Henry Laúnstein against Oliver Launstein and David Winkler to enjoin the maintenance of a sluice in a highway, and to require the filling of certain drains. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This bill is filed to enjoin the defendants from maintaining a sluiceway in the highway adjacent to complainant’s premises, and for a mandatory injunction requiring the defendant Oliver Launstein to fill up the drains upon his farm which carry water from off said Oliver Launstein’s farm down through said sluice-way in question and upon the land of complainant.
Complainant and defendant Launstein own each 80 acres of land, the complainant on the west, and the defendant on the east side of a north and south highway in the township of Owosso. At a point some 30 rods south of the northerly line of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gregory v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Boyd v. ConklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Chapel v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wiggins v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Switzer v. YuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Davis v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Miller v. ZahnMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- County of Saginaw v. McKillopMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.