Legal Opinion

Switzer v. Yunt

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1935No. Civ. 1378PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants are owners of tracts of land in Tulare County on opposite sides of a county road which runs north and south. Defendants own eighty acres which extend one-half mile along the east side of the road, and plaintiffs own twenty acres which extend one-eighth of a mile along its west side. The south boundaries of the two tracts form a straight line. The county road is graded above the level of the adjoining lands for the entire distance of one-half mile except in two places, one being just south of the north line of plaintiff’s property, and the other in a place that does…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Los Angeles Cemetery Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Pickerill v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  4. McDaniel v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Wood v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Northwestern Title Security Co. v. FlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Locklin v. City of LafayetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mogle v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. City of Oakland v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. DeCorsey v. Purex CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API