Tappendorff v. Moranda
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff is the wife of Fredrich Tappendorff, and seeks by this action to recover from the defendant the possession of certain real property in the county of Humboldt. In her complaint, after setting forth facts under which a homestead might be declared by her husband, she alleges that on the sixteenth day of May, 1878, her husband executed and acknowledged “ a valid declaration of homestead ” upon said premises, and that the same was on said day recorded in the office of the county recorder. A copy of the said declaration is attached to the complaint, and by averment made a part…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cunha v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Reinhart v. LugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Reid v. Englehart-Davidson Mercantile Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Thompson v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Ames v. EldredCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Thompson v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Smith's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Johnson v. BraunerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Taylor v. MadiganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.